Peer Review

At Artificial Intelligence in Molecular Physics, each submission is put through a rigorous and unbiased review procedure to ensure outstanding academic quality.

• Each of these pieces is reviewed by editors that examine the feel of freshness, the quality of writing, perhaps the location.

• Each paper is scrutinized by a new pair of eyes by experts. The decision they make determines its progress.

• The second item of anonymity aids in the fairness of judgments made in the course of evaluation. The identity of the author is invisible to the reviewers - this arrangement makes bias insidious in the background.

• Methodology, contribution to the field, scientific value, and clarity are all assessed.

• In response to reviewer remarks, authors may be asked to modify their contributions as needed.

• The editorial board makes final decisions based on recommendations from reviewers.

• Safety of private details remains firm throughout each step of review.

Clear goals set the stage for every review. Because guidance matters, writers get responses that are tough but helpful. High standards remain, always present. Improvement moves forward, driven by a steady focus on doing things well.